Tender Summary
The Debrecen County City Government in Hungary from Europe region has released this tender for Environmental development of Bem Square as part of the project with identification number TOP_PLUSZ-1.3.2-23-DE1-2025-00001. The development area included in the green area reconstruction in the northern and southern development areas is 12,520 m2 in total, of which 8,900 m2 is the size of the renewed or newly created green area. Reason for exclusion of bidding in parts: Based on the combined, complex examination of the economic, technical, quality and organizational aspects related to the performance of the contract, the Contracting Authority has determined that in the case of the green area reconstruction and public area development investment consisting of several elements, which is the subject of the public procurement, ensuring bidding in parts is not compatible with the implementation of the investment in accordance with its intended purpose, with uniform quality and on time. The development is a complex landscape architecture and infrastructure development investment implemented along a unified concept, which includes plant planting works, the construction of the irrigation system, pavement construction tasks, the installation of playground and street furniture elements, water engineering interventions (fountain renovation, rainwater drainage), and the installation of the public safety system (cameras). These elements are technically and functionally built on each other, they interact closely with each other, and treating them as separate parts would jeopardize the unified functionality of the investment. Some types of work of the investment are not implemented independently, but as a prerequisite for each others implementation and as a system that builds on each other. For example, plant planting works are directly related to the construction and commissioning of the irrigation system, since the sustainability of the planted plant stock can only be ensured with the appropriate design and adjustment of the irrigation system. Pavement construction works are also closely related to stormwater management solutions, as the drainage and drainage of stormwater towards green areas must be ensured during the construction of paving stones and asphalt pavements. The installation of playground equipment, street furniture, surveillance cameras and other public space equipment can also be carried out in line with the final landscaping, utility and pavement construction works. Due to such an intertwining of the construction processes, dividing the works into specialist or functional parts would result in disproportionate coordination and technical risks. The contracting authority has a unified construction plan documentation covering the entire investment, which includes the coordinated design of the green area system, water management solutions, pavement structure and public space equipment. The design documentation uses integrated technical solutions (especially the connection between plant surfaces and the irrigation system, the infiltration system of paved surfaces and rainwater drainage, and the connection of areas with different functions),if they were to be broken up, the coordination of the construction would become significantly more difficult, and there would be a risk of inappropriate alignments or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site handovers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential environment and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smoothness of the construction, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).and there would be a risk of inappropriate fit or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area in continuous use located in a residential environment – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment sites, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).and there would be a risk of inappropriate fit or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area in continuous use located in a residential environment – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment sites, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially in terms of work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and in continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially in terms of work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and in continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).in terms of temporary traffic engineering solutions and coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the population burden, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public area equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the project into parts based on topographic numbers or area sections would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent construction of individual area sections would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, and therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the project into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the project. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of sectoral schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).in terms of temporary traffic engineering solutions and coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the population burden, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public area equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the project into parts based on topographic numbers or area sections would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent construction of individual area sections would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, and therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the project into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the project. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of sectoral schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the investment into parts according to topographic numbers or area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of the individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the investment into parts according to topographic numbers or area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of the individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).which would overall worsen the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interfaces, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).which would overall worsen the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interfaces, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300). with tender notice no. 709363-2026 published on 14 Oct 2026. The tender is due to expire on 29 Oct 2026. This tender is sourced from TED Europa and is eligible for suppliers interested in Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning. Interested bidders can obtain further information including complete bid documents or ways to participate by registering on Tender Impulse and referencing via Tender Impulse ID 15505997.
Tender Details
Tender NoticeTI Ref: 15505997
Tender Notice No
709363-2026
Tender Organisation
Debrecen County City Government
Tender CPV
90700000 : Environmental services90710000 : Environmental management90712000 : Environmental planning90712100 : Urban environmental development planning90712500 : Environmental institution building or planning
Tender Document Type
Competition
Tender Deadline
29 Oct 2026 15 days left
Tender Description
Environmental development of Bem Square as part of the project with identification number TOP_PLUSZ-1.3.2-23-DE1-2025-00001. The development area included in the green area reconstruction in the northern and southern development areas is 12,520 m2 in total, of which 8,900 m2 is the size of the renewed or newly created green area. Reason for exclusion of bidding in parts: Based on the combined, complex examination of the economic, technical, quality and organizational aspects related to the performance of the contract, the Contracting Authority has determined that in the case of the green area reconstruction and public area development investment consisting of several elements, which is the subject of the public procurement, ensuring bidding in parts is not compatible with the implementation of the investment in accordance with its intended purpose, with uniform quality and on time. The development is a complex landscape architecture and infrastructure development investment implemented along a unified concept, which includes plant planting works, the construction of the irrigation system, pavement construction tasks, the installation of playground and street furniture elements, water engineering interventions (fountain renovation, rainwater drainage), and the installation of the public safety system (cameras). These elements are technically and functionally built on each other, they interact closely with each other, and treating them as separate parts would jeopardize the unified functionality of the investment. Some types of work of the investment are not implemented independently, but as a prerequisite for each others implementation and as a system that builds on each other. For example, plant planting works are directly related to the construction and commissioning of the irrigation system, since the sustainability of the planted plant stock can only be ensured with the appropriate design and adjustment of the irrigation system. Pavement construction works are also closely related to stormwater management solutions, as the drainage and drainage of stormwater towards green areas must be ensured during the construction of paving stones and asphalt pavements. The installation of playground equipment, street furniture, surveillance cameras and other public space equipment can also be carried out in line with the final landscaping, utility and pavement construction works. Due to such an intertwining of the construction processes, dividing the works into specialist or functional parts would result in disproportionate coordination and technical risks. The contracting authority has a unified construction plan documentation covering the entire investment, which includes the coordinated design of the green area system, water management solutions, pavement structure and public space equipment. The design documentation uses integrated technical solutions (especially the connection between plant surfaces and the irrigation system, the infiltration system of paved surfaces and rainwater drainage, and the connection of areas with different functions),if they were to be broken up, the coordination of the construction would become significantly more difficult, and there would be a risk of inappropriate alignments or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site handovers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential environment and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smoothness of the construction, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).and there would be a risk of inappropriate fit or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area in continuous use located in a residential environment – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment sites, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).and there would be a risk of inappropriate fit or technical incompatibilities. The construction work processes are closely intertwined in space and time. Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially with regard to work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area in continuous use located in a residential environment – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment sites, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially in terms of work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and in continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).Earthworks, utility and water construction tasks, pavement construction, and plant planting are activities that build on each other and assume each other. The parallel presence of several contractors on the work site would result in a significant additional coordination burden, especially in terms of work site transfers, temporary traffic engineering solutions, and the coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and in continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the burden on the population, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public facilities, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing it into parts according to topographic numbers or according to area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security and protection, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and construction risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).in terms of temporary traffic engineering solutions and coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the population burden, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public area equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the project into parts based on topographic numbers or area sections would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent construction of individual area sections would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, and therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the project into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the project. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of sectoral schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).in terms of temporary traffic engineering solutions and coordination of various specialist works. Due to the nature of the area affected by the development – a public area located in a residential area and under continuous use – a unified organization is particularly justified, which ensures the smooth implementation, the minimization of the population burden, and the avoidance of accident-prone situations. The exclusion of partial bids is also justified by the fact that the topographic numbers indicated in the call for tenders do not indicate separate, independently manageable investment locations, but physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public area equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the project into parts based on topographic numbers or area sections would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent construction of individual area sections would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, and therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the project into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of work areas would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the project. In addition, potential disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of sectoral schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the investment into parts according to topographic numbers or area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of the individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).but rather physically interconnected properties that form a unified public space system of Bem Square and its immediate surroundings. The green areas, pavements, transport connections, public space equipment, playground elements, water management facilities and public safety systems that are the subject of the development form a single functional unit, the usability and proper operation of which can only be ensured by the full implementation of the investment. Dividing the investment into parts according to topographic numbers or area parts would result in artificial separation, which would not reflect the real structure of the investment from either a technical or operational perspective. The independent implementation of the individual area parts would not result in functionally separate facilities that can be used on their own, therefore their treatment as separate public procurement parts cannot be considered reasonable. From an economic perspective, dividing the investment into parts would entail significant additional costs. In the case of multiple contractors, parallel organizational costs (parade facilities, temporary utilities, security, traffic technology) and multiple handovers and takeovers of the work area would arise, which would overall impair the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interface areas, liability issues) could result in further time and cost increases. Due to the territorial unit of the investment, in the case of the simultaneous presence of multiple contractors, the use of the work area, material handling, use of the parade areas and the coordination of the specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).which would overall worsen the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interfaces, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).which would overall worsen the cost-effectiveness of the investment. In addition, possible disputes between different contractors (e.g. interfaces, liability issues) may result in further time and cost increases. In the event of the simultaneous presence of several contractors due to the territorial unit of the investment, the use of work areas, material handling, use of parade areas and coordination of specialist schedules would require the establishment of a separate coordination organization, which would entail additional additional costs and implementation risks. Due to character conflict, continue in point II.2.14) Additional information (field BT-300).
Frequently Asked Questions About This Tender
Who has issued this tender, and what is it for?
The tender has been issued by Debrecen County City Government in Hungary. Such a type of tender falls under Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning, within the Education & Training sector, and is listed on Tender Impulse under notice number 709363-2026.
What are the key dates for this tender?
The notice was published on 14 Oct 2026 and submissions close on 29 Oct 2026. Late bids are rarely accepted in public procurement, so aim to have your documents ready several days before the closing date.
Which CPV codes apply to this tender?
It is classified under CPV codes 90700000, 90710000, 90712000, 90712100, 90712500, which correspond to Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning. If your company supplies these products or services, these are the codes to save in your alert profile so no matching tender passes you by.
Can I submit my bid for this tender to Tender Impulse?
No - and this matters. Tender Impulse is a tender aggregation and alert service: we collect procurement notices from official sources around the world and list them in one place. We do not receive, forward or evaluate bids. Your bid for this tender must be submitted directly to Debrecen County City Government, using the method described in the original tender document, before 29 Oct 2026. Tender Impulse provides complete assistance in submitting all bids posted on its website.
How do I get the bid documents and participation details?
Request a live demo on Tender Impulse and our tender experts will walk you through this listing, share the available documents, and explain how to submit your bid to Debrecen County City Government. Subscribers also receive help with registration requirements and, where needed, translation of non-English notices - but the submission itself always goes from you to the buyer.
How can I find more tenders like this in Hungary?
There are currently 999 live tenders of 37845 total tenders from Hungary on Tender Impulse. You can browse them on our Hungary tenders page, or save a search combining Hungary with CPV codes 90700000, 90710000, 90712000, 90712100, 90712500 - we will then email you every new match on the day it is published.
How to prepare for this bid?
Suppliers must verify technical specifications, the delivery schedules and any other intrinsic details as provided in the complete bid documents before deciding to submit their bids. All necessary certifications and supplier registrations must be undertaken before participation.
Is this tender beneficial for me?
The procurement is applicable to companies in the Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning and related industries. If you belong to this industry, you can review the technical documents before assessing your relevance to your company.
What is the procurement trend for Environmental development of Bem Square?
The public procurement trends for Environmental development of Bem Square can be assessed by viewing historical data and buying patterns for this product. Subscribed members can view and even download reports of tenders released in the past for their market research. This shall allow them to carefully prepare a compelling bid.
Explore More Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning Tenders in Hungary, Europe Region and Worldwide
Looking for more tenders like this one in Environmental services, Environmental management, Environmental planning, Urban environmental development planning, Environmental institution building or planning? With millions of global procurement opportunities and new tenders added daily, Tender Impulse is your gateway to international and local contracting success. Whether you're targeting the Education & Training sector in Hungary, or expanding across regions, we provide live, accurate and relevant updates every day.
Our platform sources tenders from national and local government portals, international development and funding agencies, municipal corporations, state authorities, NGOs, education ministries and public-private partnerships.
Daily Tender Updates Across 190+ Countries
Every day we add hundreds of new RFPs, RFQs, EOIs and contract awards across multiple sectors and geographies. This tender from Hungary is just a sample of what's available right now - there are currently 999 live Hungary tenders to explore.
Search Smarter with CPV and Industry Matching
Each listing is categorised using CPV codes such as 90700000, 90710000, 90712000, 90712100, 90712500, enabling precise filtering by tender type, location, industry, deadline and issuing organisation.
Start Your Tender Journey
Request a free live demo to unlock tenders customised to your sector, country and CPV categories - with alerts, documents and submission support.