Comprehensive service in the creation and production of advertising materials and other materials for NASK-PIB

The Scientific and Academic Computer Network - National Research Institute in Poland from Europe region has released this tender for 1. The subject of the order is the conclusion of a Framework Agreement for the provision of comprehensive services in the scope of creation and production of advertising materials, cooperation with influencers, etc., aimed at promoting NASK-PIB activities, based on a Framework Agreement concluded with more than one Contractor, i.e., with three Contractors who submitted the most advantageous offers based on the offer evaluation criteria specified in the contract notice and procurement documents. The Ordering Party will conduct social, information, and educational campaigns aimed at informing specific groups of recipients about ongoing projects in the fields of, among others, cybersecurity, disinformation, science and research, the .pl domain, digital education, new technologies, etc. 2. Pursuant to Art. 314 sec. 1 item 3) of the Public Procurement Law, the Ordering Party intends to conclude a Framework Agreement with more than one Contractor, i.e., with three (3) Contractors who submitted non-rejectable offers, and whose offers were deemed the most advantageous. 3. The Ordering Party will award detailed Orders under the terms of the order specified in the Framework Agreement template. 4. A detailed description of the Subject Matter of the Order is included in Appendix No. 1 to the ToR. 5. The Ordering Party reserves the right to execute the subject matter of the Framework Agreements in accordance with the actual needs of the Ordering Party. In the event of failure to execute all or part of the subject matter of a given Framework Agreement, the Contractor will not be entitled to any claim against the Ordering Party. 6. The detailed scope of the detailed Order and all conditions for the execution of the detailed Order are specified in the Framework Agreement template. 7. The Ordering Party requires that the offered subject matter of the order, including all ICT products, ICT services and ICT processes used to execute the order, does not include: 1) ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Art. 33, sec. 4 of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system (Journal of Laws of 2026, items 20 and 252), stating their negative impact on the fundamental interest of state security, 2) an ICT product, the type of which was specified in the decision on recognizing the supplier as a high-risk supplier, referred to in art. 67b sec. 15 of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or an ICT service, or an ICT process, specified in this decision. If the Contractor offers the solution referred to in item 1) or 2) above, the offer will be subject to rejection on the basis of art. 226 sec. 1 item 17) or item 19) of the Public Procurement Law. 8. Contract completion deadline: 1) The Ordering Party will conclude Framework Agreements for a period of 30 months counted from the date of conclusion of the Framework Agreement or from the date of conclusion of the Agreement until the budget amount indicated in § 9 sec. 1 of the Framework Agreement, whichever occurs first. 2) The Framework Agreement will be automatically extended by 6 months if the funds referred to in § 9 sec. are not exhausted by the deadline specified in sec. 1.1 of the Framework Agreement template. 3) The Ordering Party will award Executive Orders during the term of the Framework Agreements. 4) Executive Orders will be executed within the deadlines specified in the Executive Request and subsequently specified in the Executive Agreement. 5) The final Declaration of Exercise of the Option Right will be submitted by the Ordering Party no later than 15 calendar days before the expiration of the Framework Agreement. 9. In cases where the detailed description of the subject matter of the order indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source, or a specific process that characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to the privilege or elimination of certain contractors or products, this means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject matter of the order with sufficiently precise terms, and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the order. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source, or a specific process should be read with the words "or equivalent." 10. If the description of the subject of the contract contains references to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications, and reference systems referred to in art. 101 sec. 1 item 2 and sec. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the contracting authority, in accordance with art. 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Act, allows the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification, or technical reference system is indicated in this ToR, it should be assumed that the phrase "or equivalent" has been used in relation to them. 11. The Contracting Authority understands an equivalent solution as a solution that meets the conditions specified in the ToR to an equivalent degree. 12. A contractor who cites equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to prove in its offer, in particular using the relevant evidence referred to in art. 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, that the solutions it proposes meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. Evidence, in particular the evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Public Procurement Law, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract to an equivalent degree, is not subject to supplementation. 13. The Ordering Party does not allow negotiations to improve the content of offers submitted in response to the contract notice. 14. Method of evaluating offers: When selecting the most advantageous offer from among the offers not subject to rejection submitted in response to the contract notice, the Ordering Party will be guided by the criteria and their weightings and will evaluate the offers within the offer evaluation criteria. The Ordering Party intends to conclude a Framework Agreement with more than one Contractor, i.e. with three (3) Contractors who submitted offers not subject to rejection and whose offers were deemed the most advantageous.3) The Ordering Party will award Executive Orders during the term of the Framework Agreements. 4) Executive Orders will be executed within the deadlines indicated in the Executive Request for Proposals and subsequently specified in the Executive Agreement. 5) The final Declaration of Exercise of the Option Right will be submitted by the Ordering Party no later than 15 calendar days before the expiry of the Framework Agreement. 9. In cases where the detailed description of the subject matter of the order indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process that characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to favoring or eliminating certain contractors or products, this means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject matter of the order using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the order. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process should be read with the words "or equivalent". 10. If the description of the subject matter of the order contains references to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Art. 101, sec. 1 point 2 and sec. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the contracting authority, in accordance with art. 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Act, allows the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this ToR, it should be assumed that the phrase “or equivalent” is used in relation to them. 11. By equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands a solution that meets the conditions specified in the ToR to an equivalent degree. 12. The contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to prove in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in art. 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, that the solutions proposed by it meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. Evidence, in particular the evidence referred to in art. 104-107 of the Public Procurement Law, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree, are not subject to supplementation. 13. The Ordering Party does not allow negotiations to improve the content of offers submitted in response to the contract notice. 14. Method of evaluating offers: When selecting the most advantageous offer from among the offers not subject to rejection submitted in response to the contract notice, the Ordering Party will be guided by the criteria and their weightings and will evaluate the offers within the offer evaluation criteria. The Ordering Party intends to conclude a Framework Agreement with more than one Contractor, i.e. with 3 (three) Contractors who submitted offers not subject to rejection and whose offers were deemed the most advantageous.3) The Ordering Party will award Executive Orders during the term of the Framework Agreements. 4) Executive Orders will be executed within the deadlines indicated in the Executive Request for Proposals and subsequently specified in the Executive Agreement. 5) The final Declaration of Exercise of the Option Right will be submitted by the Ordering Party no later than 15 calendar days before the expiry of the Framework Agreement. 9. In cases where the detailed description of the subject matter of the order indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process that characterizes the products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to favoring or eliminating certain contractors or products, this means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject matter of the order using sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject matter of the order. In such situations, any references to trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process should be read with the words "or equivalent". 10. If the description of the subject matter of the order contains references to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Art. 101, sec. 1 point 2 and sec. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the contracting authority, in accordance with art. 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Act, allows the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this ToR, it should be assumed that the phrase “or equivalent” is used in relation to them. 11. By equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands a solution that meets the conditions specified in the ToR to an equivalent degree. 12. The contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to prove in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in art. 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, that the solutions proposed by it meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. Evidence, in particular the evidence referred to in art. 104-107 of the Public Procurement Law, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree, are not subject to supplementation. 13. The Ordering Party does not allow negotiations to improve the content of offers submitted in response to the contract notice. 14. Method of evaluating offers: When selecting the most advantageous offer from among the offers not subject to rejection submitted in response to the contract notice, the Ordering Party will be guided by the criteria and their weightings and will evaluate the offers within the offer evaluation criteria. The Ordering Party intends to conclude a Framework Agreement with more than one Contractor, i.e. with 3 (three) Contractors who submitted offers not subject to rejection and whose offers were deemed the most advantageous. with tender notice no. 717515-2026 published on 16 Oct 2026. The tender is due to expire on 18 Nov 2026. This tender is sourced from TED Europa and is eligible for suppliers interested in Advertising material, Advertising and marketing services, Advertising services, Advertising campaign services. Interested bidders can obtain further information including complete bid documents or ways to participate by registering on Tender Impulse and referencing via Tender Impulse ID 15628712.