Delivery of brand new spring suspension elements for Metropolis 98B metro cars in 2028-2030

The Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o.o. in Poland from Europe region had released this tender for 1. The subject of the Order is the delivery of brand new spring suspension elements for Metropolis 98B metro cars in the years 2028-2030 (hereinafter also referred to as "parts"). 2. The scope of the Subject of the Order includes the delivery of parts divided into three tasks. The names and quantities of parts for individual tasks are indicated in the "List of Ordered Parts" constituting Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications (hereinafter: "ST"), constituting Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications (SWZ) and constituting an integral part thereof. 3. The Ordering Party requires the delivery of the Subject of the Order in batches, according to the delivery schedule and in the quantities indicated in Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications. A maximum of two partial deliveries are permissible within one batch. 4. The delivered Subject of the Order must be brand new and unused (brand new and unused means spare parts in their original packaging, with no signs of use). 5. The Contractor will provide a 36-month warranty for the delivered parts under the terms specified in the contract template. For a period equal to the warranty period granted by the Contractor, the subject of the Order will be covered by a warranty for defects. 6. The Subject of the Order will be completed in accordance with the procedure documentation, i.e.: this Specification of Technical Conditions and its annexes, in particular the Technical Conditions and the contract template (Annex No. 2 to the Specification of Technical Conditions). 7. The Ordering Party is unable to describe the Subject of the Order in the manner referred to in Article 99, Section 4 of the Public Procurement Act, i.e. without indicating trademarks. Therefore, the spring suspension elements specified in Annex No. 1 to the Technical Conditions were described using the catalog numbers of the part manufacturer/manufacturer of the metro vehicle in which the part was installed. The use of manufacturer catalog numbers is justified by the specific nature of the Subject of the Order. Taking the above into account, in accordance with Article 99, Section 5 of the Public Procurement Act, the Ordering Party allows the submission of an offer for products equivalent to those indicated by the Ordering Party. When offering equivalent parts: 1) they must have the same parameters as the original parts, while meeting the functional requirements of the original parts and be compatible with other vehicle components, 2) the use of equivalent parts must not result in a high risk of change, which means that changes resulting from the use of equivalent parts must be reversible and, in the event of a failure, generate low failure consequences, 3) the Ordering Party requires that the manufacturer of equivalent parts has a Quality Management System implemented in its company, 4) the Contractor is responsible for the risk of their introduction into service and for defects in the offered equivalent parts. The Contractor offering the supply of equivalent parts: - declares in the offer form that it offers and will deliver equivalent parts, - indicates in the offer form the items from Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications for which it offers equivalent parts, - includes in the offer form the data of the offered equivalent parts, i.e. the names of the equivalent parts,manufacturers of equivalent parts, catalog numbers/designations of equivalent parts, and the Contractor is obliged to describe the offered equivalent parts in the offer in a manner enabling the Ordering Party to clearly determine which equivalent parts the Contractor is offering in a given item of the offer form. - together with the offer, the Contractor will present the relevant evidence, i.e.: a) a copy of the Quality Management System implementation certificate issued by the accreditation body for the manufacturer of the offered equivalent parts – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter b) of the Technical Specifications; b) a copy of the assessment of the significance of the change (performed on its own and at its own expense) concerning the offered equivalent parts. The result of such assessment must be classified as a non-significant change, not related to safety. Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a statement (in accordance with Annex 4 to the Technical Specifications) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the Technical Specifications; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the Office of Rail Transport that these parts can be used in the vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.The Contractor is obliged to describe the offered equivalent parts in the offer in a manner enabling the Ordering Party to clearly determine which equivalent parts the Contractor is offering in a given item of the offer form. - together with the offer, the Contractor will present the relevant evidence, i.e.: a) a copy of the Quality Management System implementation certificate issued by the accreditation body for the manufacturer of the offered equivalent parts – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter b) of the ST; b) a copy of the assessment of the significance of the change (performed on its own and at its own expense) regarding the offered equivalent parts. The result of such assessment must be classified as a non-significant change, not related to safety. Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a statement (in accordance with Annex 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the Office of Rail Transport that these parts can be used in the vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.The Contractor is obliged to describe the offered equivalent parts in the offer in a manner enabling the Ordering Party to clearly determine which equivalent parts the Contractor is offering in a given item of the offer form. - together with the offer, the Contractor will present the relevant evidence, i.e.: a) a copy of the Quality Management System implementation certificate issued by the accreditation body for the manufacturer of the offered equivalent parts – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter b) of the ST; b) a copy of the assessment of the significance of the change (performed on its own and at its own expense) regarding the offered equivalent parts. The result of such assessment must be classified as a non-significant change, not related to safety. Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a statement (in accordance with Annex 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the Office of Rail Transport that these parts can be used in the vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.a) a copy of the Quality Management System implementation certificate, issued by the accreditation body, for the manufacturer of the offered equivalent parts – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter b) of the ST; b) a copy of the assessment of the significance of the change (performed on its own and at its own expense) concerning the offered equivalent parts. The result of such assessment must be qualification as a non-significant change, not related to safety. Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a declaration (in accordance with Appendix 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the UTK that these parts can be used in vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.a) a copy of the Quality Management System implementation certificate, issued by the accreditation body, for the manufacturer of the offered equivalent parts – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter b) of the ST; b) a copy of the assessment of the significance of the change (performed on its own and at its own expense) concerning the offered equivalent parts. The result of such assessment must be qualification as a non-significant change, not related to safety. Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a declaration (in accordance with Appendix 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the UTK that these parts can be used in vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a declaration (in accordance with Annex No. 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the UTK that these parts can be used in the vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.Based on the assessment of the significance of the change, the Contractor will submit a declaration (in accordance with Annex No. 4 to the ST) confirming the following equivalence criteria: the reversibility of the change and the consequences of failure are low – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letters a) and c) of the ST; c) a copy of the declaration issued by the vehicle manufacturer or a body notified and authorized by the UTK that these parts can be used in the vehicles operated by Metro Warszawskie Sp. z o. o. vehicles for which a "Certificate of Authorisation to Operate a Railway Vehicle Type" No. T/2001/0137 was issued by the Chief Railway Inspector under the Rail Transport Act of 28 March 2003, that they are substitutable with the original ones with the same parameters and requirements – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter d) of the Technical Specifications; d) a copy of the full technical, operational and operational documentation, along with the Technical Specifications and Operational Manuals. Upon conclusion of the contract, the Ordering Party will acquire the right to use the above-mentioned documentation. The documentation should include: manufacturer's numbers, their parameters, recycling principles – in accordance with point 2 sub-point 2.3 letter e) of the Technical Specifications; e) The contractor introducing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the process of assessing the significance of the change has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered by it meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party - in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted by it is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Art. 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Law, will request its submission or supplementation within the specified time limit.e) ST; e) The Contractor implementing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 – in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the change significance assessment process has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party – in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Article 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Act, will request its submission or supplementation within a specified time limit.e) ST; e) The Contractor implementing the change is obliged to analyze it and classify it into one of six categories in accordance with EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 402/2013 and, if necessary, through an assessment body, assess the correctness of the application of the risk management process and prepare an appropriate report. The assessment body must meet the criteria indicated in Annex II to the aforementioned Regulation 402/2013 – in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter f) of the ST; f) full documentation (copy) confirming that the change significance assessment process has been carried out, in order to demonstrate that the products offered meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party – in accordance with point 2, sub-point 2.3, letter g) of the ST. If the Contractor fails to submit the evidence in question or the evidence submitted is incomplete, the Ordering Party, acting under Article 107, section 2 of the Public Procurement Act, will request its submission or supplementation within a specified time limit. with tender notice no. 678223-2026 published on 07 Oct 2026. The tender expired on 12 Oct 2026. This tender is sourced from TED Europa and is eligible for suppliers interested in Parts of locomotives or rolling stock. Interested bidders can obtain further information including complete bid documents or ways to participate by registering on Tender Impulse and referencing via Tender Impulse ID 15300467.