Delivery of computer servers for the University of Gdańsk Computer Centre with option rights.

The University of Gdańsk in Poland from Europe region has released this tender for 1. The subject of the order is the delivery of computer servers, hereinafter referred to as "equipment", for the University of Gdańsk Computer Centre with option rights. 2. The order covers the delivery of computing servers in the following quantities: 1) for the basic order: 3 pieces, 2) for an order covered by the right of option: a maximum of 3 pieces. 3. Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) Classification Code: 48822000-6 (computer servers). 4. The Ordering Party has the option to increase the quantity of equipment ordered under the basic order, on the terms and in the manner described below: 1) The Ordering Party may, within 14 days of concluding the contract, submit to the Contractor orders covered by the right of option, specifying the quantity and type of equipment indicated in the offer form – Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications, provided that the maximum scope of the right of option specified in this appendix is ​​not exceeded, 2) submission of an order covered by the right of option to the Contractor by an authorized Representative of the Ordering Party, referred to in § 12 sec. 1 item 2, in the manner specified in § 6 item 4 of the draft agreement – ​​Appendix No. 4 to the Technical Specifications, constitutes the Ordering Party's exercise of the option right regarding the quantity and type of equipment indicated in this order. 3) The Ordering Party may exercise the option right once or repeatedly by placing subsequent orders covering selected quantities and types of equipment, until the maximum scope of the option right specified in the offer form – Appendix No. 1 to the agreement is exhausted, but no later than the deadline referred to in item 1. 4) the value of the equipment ordered under the option right will be consistent with the unit prices indicated by the Contractor in the offer form – Appendix No. 1 to the Technical Specifications. 5) the deadline for completion of each order covered by the option right: up to 30 days from the date of submission by the Ordering Party of the order covered by the option right. 6) the exercise of the option right does not constitute an amendment to the agreement. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any claim against the Ordering Party for the Ordering Party's failure to exercise the option right in whole or in part. The decision to exercise the option right, including its scope, is a unilateral entitlement of the Ordering Party, 7) the provisions of the draft agreement – ​​Appendix No. 4 to the ToR regarding the basic order apply accordingly to orders covered by the option right, unless otherwise stipulated. 5. A detailed description of the subject of the order is set out in Appendix No. 5 to the ToR – description of the subject of the order. 6. Place of delivery of the equipment: IT Center of the University of Gdańsk, ul. prof. Marii Janion 7, 80-309 Gdańsk. 7. The Ordering Party requires a 36-month warranty for the equipment. Details regarding the warranty are included in § 7 of the draft agreement – ​​Appendix No. 4 to the ToR. 8. In the description of the subject of the order, constituting Appendix No. 5 to the ToR,The Ordering Party has described the requirements for management systems relating to the production process of the offered equipment by reference to the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract. Whenever these standards are indicated in the content of the ToR, including in the annexes thereto, such reference should be understood to be accompanied by the words "or equivalent." Therefore, the Ordering Party accepts solutions equivalent to the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, in accordance with Art. 101, sections 4 and 5 of the Public Procurement Law. Equivalence should be understood as meaning that the offered equipment comes from production covered by an implemented and current management system that meets the requirements specified in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. The equivalent solutions used must correspond, in their type and scope, to the purposes served by the standards referred to in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract. 9. Due to the possibility of various equivalent proposals, the Contractor is required to verify and treat all solutions as interrelated. Demonstrating equivalence, i.e., meeting the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree, rests with the Contractor. If offering equipment originating from production covered by a management system compliant with an equivalent standard or another solution equivalent to the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, the Contractor is obligated to indicate this solution in item 6 of the offer form, constituting Appendix 1 to the Technical Specifications, provide information on the offered equivalent solution, a justification for its equivalence, and evidence confirming equivalence. The Ordering Party will not reject the Contractor's offer solely because the offered equipment does not originate from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in Article 104 – 107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in item no. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent extent (art. 101 sec. 5 of the Public Procurement Law). 10. After signing the contract, the Ordering Party intends to apply for a 0% VAT rate on the basis of art. 83 sec. 14 item 1 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on Goods and Services Tax (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended).that the offered equipment comes from production covered by an implemented and current management system that meets the requirements specified in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. The equivalent solutions used must correspond, in their type and scope, to the objectives of the standards referenced in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract. 9. Due to the possibility of various equivalent proposals, the Contractor is required to verify and treat all solutions as interrelated. Demonstrating equivalence, i.e., equivalent fulfillment of the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract, lies with the Contractor. If the offered equipment comes from production covered by a management system compliant with an equivalent standard or another solution equivalent to the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, the Contractor is obligated to indicate this solution in point 6 of the offer form, constituting Appendix 1 to the Technical Specifications, provide information on the offered equivalent solution, a justification for its equivalence, and evidence confirming its equivalence. The Ordering Party will not reject the Contractor’s offer solely because the offered equipment does not come from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in item no. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in art. 104–107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in item no. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree (art. 101 sec. 5 of the Public Procurement Law). 10. After signing the contract, the Ordering Party expects to apply for a 0% VAT rate on the basis of art. 83 sec. 14 item 1 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended).that the offered equipment comes from production covered by an implemented and current management system that meets the requirements specified in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. The equivalent solutions used must correspond, in their type and scope, to the objectives of the standards referenced in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract. 9. Due to the possibility of various equivalent proposals, the Contractor is required to verify and treat all solutions as interrelated. Demonstrating equivalence, i.e., equivalent fulfillment of the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in the description of the subject of the contract, lies with the Contractor. If the offered equipment comes from production covered by a management system compliant with an equivalent standard or another solution equivalent to the standards indicated in item 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, the Contractor is obligated to indicate this solution in point 6 of the offer form, constituting Appendix 1 to the Technical Specifications, provide information on the offered equivalent solution, a justification for its equivalence, and evidence confirming its equivalence. The Ordering Party will not reject the Contractor’s offer solely because the offered equipment does not come from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in item no. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in art. 104–107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in item no. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree (art. 101 sec. 5 of the Public Procurement Law). 10. After signing the contract, the Ordering Party expects to apply for a 0% VAT rate on the basis of art. 83 sec. 14 item 1 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended).present information about the offered equivalent solution, justification for its equivalence, and evidence confirming equivalence. The Ordering Party will not reject the Contractor's offer solely because the offered equipment does not come from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in item No. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in Art. 104–107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in item No. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree (Art. 101 sec. 5 of the Public Procurement Law). 10. After signing the contract, the Ordering Party expects to apply for a 0% VAT rate pursuant to Art. 83 sec. 14 item 1 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended).present information about the offered equivalent solution, justification for its equivalence, and evidence confirming equivalence. The Ordering Party will not reject the Contractor's offer solely because the offered equipment does not come from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in item No. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the offer, in particular using the evidence referred to in Art. 104–107 of the Public Procurement Law, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified by the Ordering Party in item No. 14 of Table 1 of the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree (Art. 101 sec. 5 of the Public Procurement Law). 10. After signing the contract, the Ordering Party expects to apply for a 0% VAT rate pursuant to Art. 83 sec. 14 item 1 of the Act of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended). with tender notice no. 679728-2026 published on 07 Oct 2026. The tender is due to expire on 09 Nov 2026. This tender is sourced from TED Europa and is eligible for suppliers interested in Computer servers. Interested bidders can obtain further information including complete bid documents or ways to participate by registering on Tender Impulse and referencing via Tender Impulse ID 15301402.